Supply = universities, labs, research centers producing IP/capability.
Demand = corporates/operators with deployment pull + budgets + KPIs.
Enablers = studios, accelerators, testbeds, finance, policy, MRV.
Bridges = computed adjacency (not IP disclosure): where supply+demand are bridge-ready.
Launch Rooms = gated workspaces (NDA-ready) to assemble bundles, teams, and pilots.
Adjacency = reveal nearby matches around a selected node (disclosure-safe).
Intersections = cross-pollinated shelves (ingredients → synthesis → venture pathway).
Assets = the count of underlying supply-side ingredients that can be bundled.
Activate = pick a bridge → open Launch Room → define scope → invite parties → execute.
Bridge scoreA disclosure-safe confidence score combining (1) theme overlap, (2) capability fit, and (3) deployability signals. Higher = stronger adjacency worth a private Launch Room.
How computedComputed from tags + keyword embeddings + sector proxies (GICS / domains) + optional geo constraints. No underlying IP is exposed in public view.
Adjacency marketplaceThis view surfaces cross-pollination and white-space opportunities across many domains — it’s about “what could be built” from complementary ingredients.
Supply–demand networkThat view is a direct producer → buyer market network (corporate pull + IP supply). Both coincide: adjacency finds the best bridges; the market network routes the bridge into a scoped, gated Launch Room with the right stakeholders.